First Thoughts on Philippians 3:12-21

In the past I have seen this passage as emphasising commitment and dedication; or perhaps have come at it from a mystical dimension ('knowing Christ' spiritually, c.p. 3:10 'I want to know Christ and the power of his resurrection and the fellowship of sharing in his suffering'). Of course, all this and much besides is all there, but today I am struck at how relational the whole passage is.

Paul looks to Christ, and is discipled by him just as the 'disciples' were discipled during Christ's earthly ministry. Paul's language is powerful - he speaks (v.12) of being 'seized' by Christ (no doubt part of this looks back to the Damascus Road, but perhaps this is best seen as the beginning of a life-experience of being 'seized') [Note: NRSV and - to a lesser extent - NIV, weaken the translation 'seized'. Further work needed here.]

Then Paul anticipates that the Philippian Christians will follow his example, just as he, Paul, follows Christ. And indeed he urges that they find other 'models' as well - people who are close to hand. This comes out especially in the Jerusalem Bible: "Take as your models everybody who is already doing this and study them as you used to study us." (Us - v.17: Timothy, Epahroditus, etc.)

We need 'models' who are close to hand, presumably within our won Christian community, or close to it. Cp the other models we are offered in society at large - both individuals and in the stories we tell each other in the media etc.

What is the difference between good and bad models? It comes down to whether we seek first earthly things or heavenly things. Are these those who (as in Romans etc), liberated from the food laws, now rejoice in their freedom at the cost of the consciences of others. This would link in with Philippians 2:1ff. There is a deep concern for fellowship in the letter as a whole. (See:
http://www.religion-online.org/showchapter.asp?title=402&C=138)

My Quote for the Day

The inherent hierarchy that is present within the current structures of most denominations, even those with congregational models, prevents us from allowing the freedom which our churches need to grow. Jesus’ model from Luke 10 shows an entirely different perspective. He is totally free to send his disciples out, knowing that they may make some mistakes and yet he is not anxious that their teaching and doctrine might not be….quite sound. This freedom seems to me to be a key mark of Christian leadership and, whilst recognising the validity of questions regarding where Scripture and teaching shape a church, I agree with Frost and Hirsch when they say that ‘learning takes place much more effectively when the Christian faith community is involved in active mission...' - Jody Stowell, who also quotes Frost M & Hirsch A, The Shaping of things to Come, page 27 @
http://www.fulcrum-anglican.org.uk/page.cfm?ID=352